Digital Didactical Design Alternatif Based on Learning Obstacles in Topic of Proportion: A Study of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers
Resumo
Background: The objectives of this study are to (1) identify learning obstacles for pre-service mathematics teachers (PMTs) in understanding the concept of proportion and (2) design alternative digital didactic designs based on learning obstacle findings. Methods: In this study, an interpretive paradigm was used to conduct Didactic Design Research (DDR). This study involved 25 pre-service eighth-semester mathematics teachers at a private university in Indonesia. Data from test results, interviews, and document studies were analyzed using the triangulation method. Results: The results of this study show that PMT experiences an ontogeny type of learning obstacle. Mentally, students are not prepared to receive basic knowledge because the didactic design does not account for the relationship of prerequisite material to proportions, resulting in didactic obstacles. Barriers to epistemological learning were also identified as a result of a lack of understanding and mastery of the concept of ratio, which is only related to the context of cross-product strategy. Then, an alternative digital didactic design based on stages of the theory of didactic situations (TDS) was used, with e-learning-based Moodle as a hypothetical didactic design to minimize learning obstacles on the concept of proportion for PMT. Conclusion: PMT identified learning obstacles and then developed a hypothetical digital didactic design to minimize learning obstacles related to the concept of proportion for PMT.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.8155
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2025 Rani Sugiarni, Tatang Herman, Didi Suryadi, Sufyani Prabawanto, Sugama Maskar

Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
ANÚNCIOS
Informamos que, a partir de outubro de 2024, a revista Acta Scientia volta a aceitar submissões de artigos para publicação.
Mais, informamos que sites fraudulentos, https://periodicos-ulbrabr.org e https://periodicos-ulbrabra.org, estiveram se passando pela Acta Scientiae, utilizando nosso nome e identidade visual e até solicitado taxas de APC, que nós não cobramos. Aconselhamos cautela para evitar serem enganados por sites semelhantes.
Conceito A2 na Capes(2021)
Índice h5 do Google Scholar: 13
Índice mediana h5 do Google Scholar:24
eISSN: 2178-7727
Indexações:
A Acta Scientiae é indexada em:![]() | Scopus | ![]() | Latindex | ![]() | Edubase (SBU/UNICAMP) |
![]() | Sumarios.org | ![]() | Google Scholar | ![]() | Portal LivRe (CNEM) |
![]() | Journals for Free | ![]() | REDIB | ![]() | Galoá DOI |
Todos os trabalhos publicados aqui estão sob uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.